Sunday, January 26, 2014

Natural Phenomenons : Ball Lightning

Ball lightning is an unexplained atmospheric electrical phenomenon. The term ball lightning refers to reports of luminous, usually spherical objects with diameters varying from pea-sized to several meters. It is usually associated with thunderstorms, but lasts considerably longer than the split-second flash of a lightning bolt. Many early reports say that the ball eventually explodes, sometimes with fatal consequences, leaving behind the odor of sulfur. Many scientific hypotheses about ball lightning have been proposed over the centuries. In January 2014, spectrography data that was captured by chance (discussed below) lent support to the vaporized silicon hypothesis.




Ball lightning is an odd phenomenon. The few, fortunate people who have seen an incident describe the lightning as a roughly spherical glowing object that travels horizontally for a few seconds before vanishing. However, while several experiments have reproduced something resembling the phenomenon, the physical mechanism behind ball lightning is somewhat mysterious.
Now, a team of researchers serendipitously observed ball lightning at a time when they had the right equipment to study it. Jianyong Cen, Ping Yuan, and Simin Xue were in the field measuring the properties of ordinary lightning when they happened to catch ball lightning with both their high-speed cameras and their spectrographs. They found the chemical composition of the event matched that of soil. That strongly supports the hypothesis (proposed nearly fifteen years ago) that ball lightning is basically a dirt clod dislodged and heated to incandescence by a cloud-to-ground lightning strike.
High-speed video footage of ball lightning with its measured spectrum.
Ordinary lightning occurs due to the ionization and dissociation of molecules in the air (a process with the awesome name "dielectric breakdown"), which occurs during a static electric discharge between clouds and the ground. Ball lightning is much rarer, to the point where some have even postulated it's actually a hallucination rather than a real weather phenomenon. As the name suggests, it appears as a spherical or spheroidal ball of light, between one centimeter and one meter in size, and variously colored as purple, green, white, or orange.
Just like normal lightning, ball lightning seems to occur primarily during thunderstorms. These events persist a few seconds, and the spheres travel horizontally close to ground level.

That information primarily comes from eyewitness accounts; ball lightning is rare enough that no scientists have ever observed it in the field while they had equipment to measure its properties. At least not until the summer of 2012, when the authors of the new paper were out on the Qinghai Plateau in China during a thunderstorm, taking spectral readings of ordinary cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning.
Just a few minutes before midnight, the researchers' digital video cameras picked up a ball lightning event, evidently originating from the location of a lightning strike. By estimating the distance to the strike (including the method many of us learned as children: counting the time between the flash of light and the sound of thunder), they determined the sphere was as much as 8 meters in diameter at its greatest size. They also estimated its speed to be about 8.6 meters per second (19 miles per hour). The whole event lasted roughly 1.12 seconds.
At its origin, the ball was a bright white-violet in color, but then it faded to orange and then red before vanishing. Analyzing the spectrum, the researchers identified silicon, iron, and calcium—three of the major chemical components in soil. (Aluminum is another common element in soil, but the authors pointed out that their cameras weren't able to spot the appropriate wavelengths to identify it.) Unfortunately, their equipment was insufficiently sophisticated to measure the ball lightning's temperature, but based on the incandescent properties, it was likely between 15,000 and 30,000° C.
The chemical signature of soil particles in the ball lightning lends strong support to an idea proposed by J. Abrahamson and J. Dinniss in 2000. They noted that silicon compounds, when heated to extreme temperatures, ejected fireballs not unlike ball lightning. K. D. Stephan and N. Massey reported that they could reproduce at least some of the reported properties of ball lightning by producing molten silicon spheres.
Given the physical picture from the Qinghai observation and the experiments, the hypothesis seems plausible. A cloud-to-ground lightning strike heats a spot on the ground to high temperature, ejecting a bunch of hot particles from the soil, which glow in the characteristic way. These spheres cool and dissipate over a period of a few seconds, all while moving quickly across the ground. While this picture may not be true for all ball lightning, it's the first plausible and coherent explanation for a weird, rare phenomenon.

Saturday, January 25, 2014

Gerunds and Infinitive Baby!!



Gerunds
1. Mary keeps talking about her problems.
2. I prefer using silver instead of gold.
3. Suzanne tried cooking his husband's favorite food.
4. I enjoy listening to the music
5. Angkasa Pura II went changing on the corporate's logo.
6. Youtube denied breaking the copyright rule.
7. British Aerospace choose merging with Marconi Electronic Systems instead.
8. We enjoyed walking down the streets.
9. My father recommend riding the camels when in the desert.
10. The mass continued rioting even when the police had shot them.

Infinitive
1. I love to see the Westinghouse Sign in New York.
2. Thomson is going to France to make a new subsidiary company.
3. She would like to go to the cinema with you.
4. Technicolor is going to phase out its cinema business.
5. Leslie Moonves likes to work in CBS.
6. I decide to eat in that restaurant.
7. McDonnell Douglas are going to merge with Boeing.
8. Viacom is going to split into 2 new companies.
9. Do you like to study history?
10. I just love to listen to the music.

If Conditional in 3 Types...

1.
a If I find her address, I'll send her an invitation.
b If I found her address, I'd send her an invitation.
c If I had found her address, I would have sent her an invitation.

2.
a If I have enough money, I'll buy Viacom, Inc.
b If I had enough money, I'd buy Viacom, Inc.
c If I had had enough money, I would have bought Viacom, Inc.

3.
a You'll be what you want if you study hard.
b You would be what you want if you studied hard.
c You would have been what you want if you had studied hard.

4.
a They will lose the war if that weapon is destroyed.
b They would lose the war if that weapon was destroyed
c They would have been lost the war if that weapon had been destroyed.

5.
a Britney will sing here if you pay her a lot of money.
b Britney would sing here if you paid her a lot of money.
c Britney would have sang here if you had paid her a lot of money.

6.
a Bu Ima will be satisfied if you do the task well.
b Bu Ima would be satisfied if you did the task well
c Bu Ima would have been satisfied if you had done the task well.

7.
You will be fine if you forgive her.
b You would be fine if you forgave her.
c You would have been fine if you had forgiven her.

8.
a If i am a rich man, I will buy a big house
b If i was a rich man, i would buy a big housec If i had been a rich man, I would have bought a big house

9.
a If Enron finds the new oil rig, then it will be the largest oil company in the region.
b If Enron found the new oil rig, then it would be the largest oil company in the region.
c If Enron had found the new oil rig, then it would have been largest oil company in the region. 

10.
a Microsoft and Nokia will merge, if Nokia lose much profit.
b Microsoft and Nokia would merge, if Nokia lose much profit.
c Microsoft and Nokia would have merged, if Nokia had lost much profit.